“Lord, they have killed thy prophets, they have demolished thy altars, and I alone am left, and they seek my life.”

“I have kept for myself seven thousand men who have not bowed the knee to Baal.”

“God gave them a spirit of stupor,
eyes that should not see and ears that should not hear,
down to this very day.”

“Let their feast become a snare and a trap,
a pitfall and a retribution for them;
let their eyes be darkened so that they cannot see,
and bend their backs for ever.”

“The Deliverer will come from Zion,
he will banish ungodliness from Jacob”;

“and this will be my covenant with them
when I take away their sins.”

"Because you did not serve the LORD your God with joyfulness and gladness of heart, by reason of the abundance of all things, therefore you shall serve your enemies whom the LORD will send against you, in hunger and thirst, in nakedness, and in want of all things; and he will put a yoke of iron upon your neck, until he has destroyed you. The LORD will bring a nation against you from afar, from the end of the earth, as swift as the eagle flies, a nation whose language you do not understand, a nation of stern countenance, who shall not regard the person of the old or show favor to the young, and shall eat the offspring of your cattle and the fruit of your ground, until you are destroyed; who also shall not leave you grain, wine, or oil, the increase of your cattle or the young of your flock, until they have caused you to perish. They shall besiege you in all your towns, until your high and fortified walls, in which you trusted, come down throughout all your land; and they shall besiege you in all your towns throughout all your land, which the LORD your God has given you. And you shall eat the offspring of your own body, the flesh of your sons and daughters, whom the LORD your God has given you, in the siege and in the distress with which your enemies shall distress you. The man who is the most tender and delicately bred among you will grudge food to his brother, to the wife of his bosom, and to the last of the children who remain to him; so that he will not give to any of them any of the flesh of his children whom he is eating, because he has nothing left him, in the siege and in the distress with which your enemy shall distress you in all your towns. The most tender and delicately bred woman among you, who would not venture to set the sole of her foot upon the ground because she is so delicate and tender, will grudge to the husband of her bosom, to her son and to her daughter, her afterbirth that comes out from between her feet and her children whom she bears, because she will eat them secretly, for want of all things, in the siege and in the distress with which your enemy shall distress you in your towns.

“For who has known the mind of the Lord,
or who has been his counselor?”

“Or who has given a gift to him
that he might be repaid?”

As the first edition, DSM-I of 1952, degenerated into the now current fifth edition, the DSM-5 (published 18 May 2013), the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) has now become noteworthy for its medicalization of human distress and general lack of intellectual and scientific integrity. But back in the day it was a useful tool for classification and enhanced understanding of mental disorders. ... well, maybe. Robert Spitzer, emeritus professor of psychiatry at Columbia University was the chief architect and driving force behind the changes which became the DSM-III of 1980, but years earlier Spitzer spearheaded the American Psychiatric Association's 1973 decision to remove homosexuality from DSM's list of mental disorders, a scientifically groundless, purely political move.

"I came up with a definition in 1973 that made it possible to argue the homosexuality was not a mental disorder." — Robert Spitzer, Editor in Chief, DSM III —

An Aside on the use of the imagery of war, of armed struggle — The Church Militant.

Allow us to save for another day questions of great import touching on ... well no, delving into, whether exclusively spiritual struggle can be meant, or rather if the struggle is to involve the shedding of blood and red martyrdom – this ultimate witnessing to the faith.

Is it God's Will (are we to discern to the best of our limited abilities that it is God's Will), that the role of every faithful Orthodox-Catholic Christian is to meekly submit our necks to the swords and daggers of the evil, such as the sodomite celebrators? Might it rather be the case that we are called upon to witness to the faith through acts of physical courage which do not involve the assumption, the reasonable hope, that our put-on meekness will win the hearts and minds of sodomite sympathizers?

And how adapt Just War theory to current realities, the state power being in the service of evil utterly and the fact that there is no holy Pope to Call the Kings of Christendom for swords about the Cross, but in the place of a man like Pope Saint Pius V we now must confront Talmud and Islam, Usury and Sodomy, ignorant Nationalism and deracinated Internationalism under the leadership of a Pope Francis or whoever this College of Cardinals will elect to succeed him?

"Irreconcilable differences which have caused the irremediable breakdown of the marriage," with both "irreconcilable differences" and "irremediable breakdown" described in the broadest possible terms, actually became the law of the land governing divorce in California, the first jurisdiction to do so within Christendom, in 1969. Evidence of marital misconduct of the type Christ decreed was declared to be "improper" and "inadmissible."

The prestigious National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws came on board with "No-Fault" divorce in 1967 under the leadership of Professor Robert J. Levy of the University of Minnesota Law School.

And the American Bar Association (ABA) approved the UMDA in its 1973 (slightly) revised form. By 1989, 49 states and the District of Columbia had adopted the "modern no-fault divorce" standard, substantially along the lines of the Levy and Kay standard. (The hold out is Arkansas, which requires a whopping 18-month-long period of separation as a sufficient ground for divorce.)

The change in California's law was lead by Herma Hill Kay, then and now of Boalt Hall, the Law School of the University of California at Berkeley. Wife of Carroll Brodsky; a friend of R.B. Ginsburg; a director of the Rosenberg Foundation; the recipient of the Ruth Bader Ginsburg Lifetime Achievement Award of the Association of American Law Schools; purveyor extraordinaire of a militant anti-Christian view of feminism, this sickening enemy of the Church, of Christian women and of Christendom would need to be made an honorary Jewess were she not already one.

Robert J. Levy — take a wild guess — spearheaded what became the NCCUSL's Uniform Marrige and Divorce Act (UMDA) in 1970: adultery can not be considered for property division.

Pornography

A Printable and Broadcastable Lobotomy

Dream weapon of the Enemies of Church and Christendom

Near Complete Jew Monopoly of the Pornography Industry

In pre-Shoah Germany and Europe and in XXI century America

Cultural Marxism

But let us please from the very outset resist any temptation to overstate the significance of either this coined term – Cultural Marxism – or the named intellectual collective, the Frankfurt School. The demonaic and the Devil's human and (fallen)angelic willing collaborators work through many means and people and organizations. The Frankfurt School is only one such. Still, it is prominent enough in the civilizational struggles, the cultural wars between Good and evil. And it is brazen enough, in its announced methods of undermining the Christian nature of a confused Christendom, the infiltration many and varied institutions:

• Christian, better yet Catholic and Orthodox, Churches and their seminaries, priesthoods and episcopates;
• music or "music" and the visual and performing arts;
• (Christian founded and once Christian led)-universities;
• literature of every type and description;
• print and broadcast mass media, basically just the means of all information selection and dissemination,
• including that which is explicitly or de facto about "entertainment", read, violence and pornography and the increasingly, brazenly, explicitly diabolical (often abbreviated as Hollywood), as also a substitution at a mass level of real manly activities – work and creation – with a fake, absurd, pseudo-masculinity of watching, but really an obsession with watching, other men play sports! Just a modern day updating of the method of depriving the non-Christian masses of all their residual humanity through Panem et Circenses –Bread and Circuses;
• and of course, über Alles, that central-most and Divinely-ordained and instituted institution, the family (and on this latter Hollywood has indeed been especially active through its strategy of depicting mothers and more so still fathers as everything weak and ignorant and bad, all across thousands of films, and through its conflation of things LGBT with all things enlightened and desirable,

... all through some gradual "Long March" toward preparing the minds of the people of Christendom – and really the Cultural Marxists' focus is almost exclusively on European Christendom, and not on Ethiopia or Peru or the Philippines – to intellectually and emotionally reject everything Christian and turn instead to a non-Christian (then later increasingly, brazenly, anti-Christian), Leviathan Government, which will control and own the means of production, yes certainly, but which will in fact control everything and everyone, including of course the minds of its own functionaries and leaders.

But even as exhaustive and formidable as the just preceding list may appear, it omits even cursory mention of much of the agenda of the Cutural Marxists – really better understood as Omni Marxism and Omni Marxists. The military and police and surveillance state aspects will of course not be suddenly thrust upon European Christendom and her peoples, so much as these will proceed also through an insidious program of gradualism, through their own parallel Long March. Crisis after crisis will be manufactured to supply the justifications and achieve the popular acquiesce.

And centrally to the Long March scheme, the concentration of productive property, the means of production, in fewer and fewer hands, or in other words the deprivation of any meaningful productive property ownership by the mass of humanity — the extinguishment of the only Christian – and/or, just dignified – economic system in which the ownership of productive property is very widely distributed, as widely distributed as possible, among free private individuals and the families they build or try to build — this condition of concentrated rather than widely-distributed ownership of productive property will proceed apace but gradually. Then in the end, will the mass of people of European Christendom care much that productive property is controlled by the Commissars rather than, for example, the Koch brothers? All these families are mighty indeed and thousands of times wealthier than the just wealthy, but which of them is mightier than was the family of Николай II Романов-Nicholas Romanov? Whether and to what extend individuals understand this or fail to, concentrated crony Capitalism produces and it is the close-spirit brother of Communism. The free market plus (very) widely distributed ownership and control of productive property is Christian.

1. Theodor W. Adorno, a.k.a.,Wiesengrund wrote The Authoritarian Personality (1950), the leading attack on the patriarchial, read Christian, family, together with co-authors Else Frenkel-Brunswik, a Polish-Austrian Jewess (18 August 1908 Lemberg – Berkeley 31 March 1958) Daniel Levinson, a U. Calif. Berkeley American Jew with a 1947 dissertation on ethnocentrism (28 May 1920 – 12 April 1994), and Nevitt Sanford (1909–1996, the token Shill, obsessed with ethnocentrism and antisemitism);
2. Walter Bendix Schönflies Benjamin (15 July 1892 – 26 September 1940);
3. Erich Seligmann Fromm (23 March 1900 – 18 March 1980);
4. Henryk Grossmann (14 April 1881 Krakow – Leipzig 24 November 1950);
5. Max Horkheimer (14 February 1895 Stuttgart – Nuremberg 7 July 1973);
6. Otto Kirchheimer (11 November 1905 in Heilbronn – New York City 22 November 1965);
7. Siegfried Kracauer (8 February 1889 Frankfurt – NYC 26 November 1966);
8. Leo Löwenthal (3 November 1900 – 21 January 1993);
9. György Lukács/Georg Lukacs (13 April 1885 Hungary – 4 June 1971);
10. Herbert Marcuse (19 July 1898 Berlin – Stamberg 29 July 1979);
11. Franz Leopold Neumann (23 May 1900 – 2 September 1954);
12. Friedrich Pollock (22 May 1894 – 16 December 1970);
13. Alfred Sohn-Rethel (4 January 1899 Neuilly-sur-Seine near Paris – Bremen 6 April 1990).

Increasing the marching pace during such a Long March has obvious advantages for those who want Omni Marxism to prevail. They can actually live to see it through, very likely an added benefit for atheists. On the other hand, even the marginal loss of the character of gradualism will needs mean that a greater proportion of the population will notice the changes. Even those confident in their ultimate success will recognize that even fledgling friction entails costs and hassles they would rather avoid. Enter the controlled opposition. Offer up a regular diet of expositions of complaints and shock and disgust, and the more added vitriol the better. Even with very well done presentations, maybe especially with well done, comprehensive presentations, the sheer volume of topics covered will overwhelm almost all listeners, yes, but the real point is that something cathartic will have occurred for the mass viewing, or listening, audience. There is no effective solution offered, and the, now exhausted, audience members will feel as though the process of listening and feeling solidarity with other listeners was their contribution. The leader or leaders of the particular controlled opposition outlet in question will allow themselves to think, more or less, depending on their own respective levels of perceptiveness and integrity, that they are at the top of some intellectual pyramid of righteousness. If, for example, some writer makes a presentation to a hall full of 600 listeners, that leader will imagine that he has now informed and energized each such listener, or at least a goodly number of them. That crowd will go forth, and some great multiplier effect machine will have been set in motion by him or her. "Gee, I am not the leader of a measly 600 guys. What is that compared to the forces arrayed against us? No, in fact those 600, though not as effective as I am, to be sure, but still, they might each go out and recruit another 300. So really, I am the generalissimo of 180,000, and onward we march." OK, this is put in an exaggerated form. Still, the basic point is accurate. In fact, the audience members, or almost all of them, will view their participation in the evening as having itself constituted a contribution. Maybe a few of them even asked a good question. Maybe later a few of them will actually discuss the matters raised with some family or friends or colleagues, attempting, maybe achieving a summary of arguments raised by the primary presenter, albeit at a much reduced level of knowledge and skill. And there it ends. Just take stock folks. Over the decades of your activities, have things gotten better? Have the tables been turned on evil-doers and on evil? Has the rate of descent even slowed?

Might the matter be different if real action-point solutions did exist and were a part of the principal presentations? Let us hope, yes, but here one exits the realm of controlled opposition.

Turning from such general points to the matter directly at hand ...

Das Geld ist der eifrige Gott Israels, vor welchem kein andrer Gott bestehen darf. Das Geld erniedrigt alle Götter des Menschen - und verwandelt |375| sie in eine Ware. Das Geld ist der allgemeine, für sich selbst konstituierte Wert aller Dinge. Es hat daher die ganze Welt, die Menschenwelt wie die Natur, ihres eigentümlichen Wertes beraubt. Das Geld ist das dem Menschen entfremdete Wesen seiner Arbeit und seines Daseins, und dies fremde Wesen beherrscht ihn, und er betet es an.

Der Gott der Juden hat sich verweltlicht, er ist zum Weltgott geworden. Der Wechsel ist der wirkliche Gott des Juden. Sein Gott ist nur der illusorische Wechsel.

Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist. Money degrades all the gods of man – and turns them into commodities. Money is the universal self-established value of all things. It has, therefore, robbed the whole world – both the world of men and nature – of its specific value. Money is the estranged essence of man’s work and man’s existence, and this alien essence dominates him, and he worships it.

The god of the Jews has become secularized and has become the god of the world. The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange.

В городе появилась книгоноша, продававшая евангелие, почтенная женщина, хотя и из мещанского звания. О ней заговорили, потому что о книгоношах только что появились любопытные отзывы в столичных газетах. Опять тот же плут [Еврей, Жид, Скупец, Скряга, Жидовинъ] Лямшин, с помощью одного семинариста, праздношатавшегося в ожидании учительского места в школе, подложил потихоньку книгоноше в мешок, будто бы покупая у нее книги, целую пачку соблазнительных мерзких фотографий из-за границы, нарочно пожертвованных для сего случая, как узнали потом, одним весьма почтенным старичком, фамилию которого опускаю, с важным орденом на шее и любившим, по его выражению, "здоровый смех и веселую шутку". Когда бедная женщина стала вынимать святые книги у нас в Гостином Ряду, то посыпались и фотографии. Поднялся смех, ропот; толпа стеснилась, стали ругаться, дошло бы и до побоев, если бы не подоспела полиция. Книгоношу заперли в каталашку, и только вечером, стараниями Маврикия Николаевича, с негодованием узнавшего интимные подробности этой гадкой истории, освободили и выпроводили из города.

A respectable woman of the artisan class, who went about selling gospels, came into the town. People talked about her, because some interesting references to these gospel women had just appeared in the Petersburg Capers. Again the same buffoon, [the Jew] Lyamshin, with the help of a divinity student, who was taking a holiday while waiting for a post in the school, succeeded, on the pretence of buying books from the gospel woman, in thrusting into her bag a whole bundle of indecent and obscene photographs from abroad, sacrificed expressly for the purpose, as we learned afterwards, by a highly respectable old gentleman (I will omit his name) with an order on his breast, who, to use his own words, loved “a healthy laugh and a merry jest.” When the poor woman went to take out the holy books in the bazaar, the photographs were scattered about the place. There were roars of laughter and murmurs of indignation. A crowd collected, began abusing her, and would have come to blows if the police had not arrived in the nick of time. The gospel woman was taken to the lock-up, and only in the evening, thanks to the efforts of Mavriky Nikolaevitch, who had learned with indignation the secret details of this loathsome affair, she was released and escorted out of the town.

Not Sub-Saharan Africans or their descendants in the United States of America or elsewhere, instigated and lead and financed the NAACP, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. From its founding in 1909 this was an Atheist and Talmudic Jew instigated and financed and lead organization, to serve the perceived interests of the Jews, who couldn't care less about the welfare, temporal or eternal, of the African.

Eighty percent of their children born out of wedlock; and more than seventy percent grow up (sort of) without a father: the gift of the Jews to the Descendants of Sub-Saharan Africa who have citizenship of the United States of America.

New York Ethical Society (and Ethical Culture School), in Manhattan of course — To do away with theology and unite theists, atheists, agnostics and deists, all in the same anti-religious cause. In other words, they do violence to any notion of ethics.

Some founders and early leading figures, all Jew:

• Henry Moskowitz (also of the atheist New York Society for Ethical Culture);
  
• Jacob Schiff (also, in today's money, Billionaire Banker and Bolshevik Jew key financier and enabler);
  
• Joel Spingarn (nominally Presbyterian, Columbia University already lost), wife Amy Einstein Spingarn and brother Arthur B. Spingarn;
  
• Julius Rosenwald (also leader shareholder of Sears, Roebuck & Co);
  
• Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise (Weisz);
  
• Jacob Billikopf;
  
• Rabbi Emil G. Hirsch (also an atheist "Feminsim" leader).